Difference between revisions of "Talk:Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900"

From ThinkWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Moving applications between screens)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there.  I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem.
 
It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there.  I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem.
 
Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --[[User:Meta|Meta]] 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET)
 
Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --[[User:Meta|Meta]] 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET)
 +
 +
== Moving applications between screens ==
 +
 +
Do you mean xinerama?
 +
 +
        Section "ServerFlags"
 +
            Option "Xinerama" "true"
 +
        EndSection

Revision as of 14:31, 23 January 2007

What is the openGL performance like on this card? Could I play UT2004 and run the OpenGL screensaver hacks at a reasonable speed. In comparison To say a Radeon 9000/9200 card?

It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there. I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem. Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --Meta 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET)

Moving applications between screens

Do you mean xinerama?

       Section "ServerFlags"
           Option "Xinerama" "true"
       EndSection