Difference between revisions of "Talk:Installing Fedora 8 on a ThinkPad T61p"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can the same trick of Fedora 7 be applied to Fedora 8 regarding the alsa drivers and the sound buttons? | Can the same trick of Fedora 7 be applied to Fedora 8 regarding the alsa drivers and the sound buttons? | ||
| − | -- Yes of course, should be working as well. | + | -- Yes of course, should be working as well. --[[User:Thhart|Thhart]] 18:42, 11 January 2008 (CET) |
== 32-bit or 64-bit? == | == 32-bit or 64-bit? == | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The T61p should work with 64-bit, right? How well does that work? --[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] 18:37, 28 December 2007 (CET) | The T61p should work with 64-bit, right? How well does that work? --[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] 18:37, 28 December 2007 (CET) | ||
| − | -- I see no reason to do that, you only have less application support and probably other unknown problems. AFAIK it gives you no markable performance advantages. | + | -- I see no reason to do that, you only have less application support and probably other unknown problems. AFAIK it gives you no markable performance advantages. --[[User:Thhart|Thhart]] 18:42, 11 January 2008 (CET) |
Revision as of 19:42, 11 January 2008
Can the same trick of Fedora 7 be applied to Fedora 8 regarding the alsa drivers and the sound buttons?
-- Yes of course, should be working as well. --Thhart 18:42, 11 January 2008 (CET)
32-bit or 64-bit?
The T61p should work with 64-bit, right? How well does that work? --Whizkid 18:37, 28 December 2007 (CET)
-- I see no reason to do that, you only have less application support and probably other unknown problems. AFAIK it gives you no markable performance advantages. --Thhart 18:42, 11 January 2008 (CET)
