User talk:Tonko - Revision history

Hmh: /* Tonko, please read Akw's talk page */ new section

2011-02-06T03:57:22Z

‎Tonko, please read Akw's talk page: new section

2010-11-15T15:48:11Z

2010-03-04T23:31:32Z

‎SSD

2010-03-04T23:31:03Z

‎SSD: new section

2010-02-26T04:47:18Z

message regarding the W510 graphics card

2009-11-18T08:48:52Z

‎Thinkpad ACPI

2009-11-18T08:48:43Z

‎Thinkpad ACPI

2009-11-18T00:31:46Z

2006-08-25T12:16:28Z

‎Question about "nsc-ircc, Wrong chip version ff"

2006-07-27T16:44:04Z

‎Question about "nsc-ircc, Wrong chip version ff"

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 6 February 2011
Line 102:		Line 102:
	== Spam report ==		== Spam report ==
	[[User:Edotowiza]] seems to be a spambot. [[User:Floffe\|Floffe]] 15:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Edotowiza]] seems to be a spambot. [[User:Floffe\|Floffe]] 15:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Tonko, please read Akw's talk page ==
		+
		+	Subject says it all. Thanks.
		+	--[[User:Hmh\|hmh]] 03:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 15 November 2010
Line 98:		Line 98:

	HDD = Hard Disk Drive		HDD = Hard Disk Drive
		+
		+
		+	== Spam report ==
		+	[[User:Edotowiza]] seems to be a spambot. [[User:Floffe\|Floffe]] 15:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 SSD = Solid State '''Drive'''
 SSD = Solid State '''Disk'''
 HDD = Hard Disk Drive

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 26 February 2010
Line 82:		Line 82:

	--[[User:Tonko\|Tonko]] 14:16, 25 August 2006 (CEST)		--[[User:Tonko\|Tonko]] 14:16, 25 August 2006 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Thinkpad W510 Graphics Cards ==
		+
		+	Hi, Tonko. I have a W510 and it has a Quadro FX 880M. Furthermore, the lenovo product documentation ( http://www.lenovo.com/psref/pdf/tabook.pdf ) lists this graphics card. Where are you seeing that it's supposed to have a NVS 5100M?
		+
		+	Maybe you know something I don't, but in the interest of time (and at risk of possible rudeness), I'm going to change the wiki page back. I will make a clearer comment this time. (P.s., is this really how users on this wiki talk to each other?)
		+
		+	--[[User:Quinxex\|Quinxex]]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Are you sure that thinkpad_acpi is removed from the kernel? it's still loaded in my 2.6.31-14 kernel...
-?? thinkpad_acpi is certainly not removed from the kernel. ibm_acpi is though, or rather has been renamed to thinkpad_acpi. Having said that some of the functionality thinkpad_acpi used to provide (bays and docks) has been recently stripped from the driver, and is now the responsibility of the generic ACPI bay and dock drivers. Also on newer thinkpads (T60 and such), thinkpad_acpi is no longer used for backlight, which instead is now handled by the generic acpi video driver.
+?? thinkpad_acpi is certainly not removed from the kernel. ibm_acpi is though, or rather has been renamed to thinkpad_acpi. Having said that some of the functionality thinkpad_acpi used to provide (bays and docks) has been recently stripped from the driver, and is now the responsibility of the generic ACPI bay and dock drivers. Also on newer thinkpads (T60 and such), thinkpad_acpi is no longer used for backlight, which instead is now handled by the generic acpi video driver. --[[User:Tonko|Tonko]] 08:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 == UltraBase ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 18 November 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Are you sure that thinkpad_acpi is removed from the kernel? it's still loaded in my 2.6.31-14 kernel...		Are you sure that thinkpad_acpi is removed from the kernel? it's still loaded in my 2.6.31-14 kernel...

		+	?? thinkpad_acpi is certainly not removed from the kernel. ibm_acpi is though, or rather has been renamed to thinkpad_acpi. Having said that some of the functionality thinkpad_acpi used to provide (bays and docks) has been recently stripped from the driver, and is now the responsibility of the generic ACPI bay and dock drivers. Also on newer thinkpads (T60 and such), thinkpad_acpi is no longer used for backlight, which instead is now handled by the generic acpi video driver.

	== UltraBase ==		== UltraBase ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Hei, great work! If you have fitting pictures for the 755CD/CDV feel free to upload and change them. Concerning the 701 and 755 i'll check. Thx. [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 10:20, 17 Mar 2005 (CET)
 ----
 == UltraBase ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 25 August 2006
Line 67:		Line 67:

	--[[User:Chiron\|Chiron]] 18:41, 27 July 2006 (CEST)		--[[User:Chiron\|Chiron]] 18:41, 27 July 2006 (CEST)
		+
		+	Chiron,
		+
		+	Sorry for taking a while to respond. I have been away for a bit and started a new job and such...
		+
		+	I do not have a 60 series machine, but it does sound like the chip is not getting initialized properly upon resume.
		+
		+	You might be able to resolve this issue by simply upgrading to the latest 2.6 kernel from kernel.org, as that includes fixes for enabling the chip (without hacks), and also to re-activate the chip in FIR mode after a suspend.
		+
		+	--[[User:Tonko\|Tonko]] 14:16, 25 August 2006 (CEST)

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 Tonko,
-On the "How to make use of IrDA" page there is mention of a "Wrong chip version ff" error that is caused "if the FIR mode is not activated" when you attempt "to load the nsc-ircc module". It is also briefly discussed on the associated talk page.
+On the [[How to make use of IrDA]] page there is mention of a "Wrong chip version ff" error that is caused "if the FIR mode is not activated" when you attempt "to load the nsc-ircc module". It is also briefly discussed on the associated talk page.
 I'm running Ubuntu Dapper Drake on a Z60m, and whenever I suspend to RAM, just before the screen goes dark, a console appears that shows this error several times (once per time I've suspended since last reboot). Corresponding entries also appear in my system log. So, I am experiencing this problem, but it isn't clear to me exactly how to fix it. I'm assuming I need to activate FIR mode before loading the nsc-ircc module, but I have no idea how to do this (or exactly what this means).