Talk:Ultrabay Slim Multi-Burner Plus Drive - Revision history

Jdthood: Talk:UltraBay Slim DVD Multi-Burner Plus moved to Talk:Ultrabay Slim Multi-Burner Plus Drive

2009-02-15T21:50:50Z

Talk:UltraBay Slim DVD Multi-Burner Plus moved to Talk:Ultrabay Slim Multi-Burner Plus Drive

Whoopie: Undo corruption

2007-04-11T14:34:23Z

Undo corruption

IpiQhp at 09:09, 11 April 2007

2007-04-11T09:09:59Z

Thinker: Region-enforcing firmware

2006-04-10T11:39:28Z

Region-enforcing firmware

Thinker at 06:51, 1 October 2005

2005-10-01T06:51:21Z

Wyrfel at 22:08, 30 September 2005

2005-09-30T22:08:56Z

Thinker at 16:20, 30 September 2005

2005-09-30T16:20:39Z

84.191.159.226 at 12:14, 30 September 2005

2005-09-30T12:14:54Z

New page

Hei,

i don't like the idea of including large scale pictures for everything. While i can see the benefits of it, i think it wastes too much server space.

I want to ask for other peoples opinions here. I'd recommend including only small scale pictures comparable in size and style to the ones included in the model categories or like on the UltraBay Plus Devices pages.

What's other peoples opinions?

[[User:84.191.159.226|84.191.159.226]] 14:14, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST)
----

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 11 April 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Hei Thinker,		Hei Thinker,

−	please don't feel offended. I'm just very (i know - overly) picky about consistency here. The server space reason is just one of the objections i have, actually the most objective one. I'm also worried about a consistent quality and "look	+	please don't feel offended. I'm just very (i know - overly) picky about consistency here. The server space reason is just one of the objections i have, actually the most objective one. I'm also worried about a consistent quality and "look&feel" of the pictures and pages (i.e., they should be included as thumbnails on the pages with a large scale version when one clicks them). However, this can be achieved i.e. by a templated way of integrating them and i'd be happy to look into that myself. But I just wanted to get other peoples opinions about it before I'm doing anything.
		+
		+	[[User:Wyrfel\|Wyrfel]] 00:08, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)
		+	----
		+
		+	Sure, whatever you feel is best.<br>By the way, the reason I took the trouble with those pictures is that it took me a while to figure out the "Plus" designation part and whether that specific drive is or is not a "Plus" model (the abbreviated notation on the drive is confusing).
		+
		+	--[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 08:51, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)
		+	----
		+
		+	== Region-enforcing firmware ==
		+
		+	<nowiki><rant></nowiki>
		+	Damn, I don't believe I've paid this much for a broken-by-design DVD drive with firmware that enforces region coding in a way that blocks DeCSS. A flight-faring laptop owner would never want to watch movies on ''both'' sides of the Atlantic, right? These greedy, braindead bastards have evidently inhaled too many [http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/8714.jpg Windows keys].
		+	<nowiki></rant></nowiki>
		+
		+	--[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 13:39, 10 April 2006 (CEST)
		+	----

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 11 April 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Hei Thinker,		Hei Thinker,

−	please don't feel offended. I'm just very (i know - overly) picky about consistency here. The server space reason is just one of the objections i have, actually the most objective one. I'm also worried about a consistent quality and "look&feel" of the pictures and pages (i.e., they should be included as thumbnails on the pages with a large scale version when one clicks them). However, this can be achieved i.e. by a templated way of integrating them and i'd be happy to look into that myself. But I just wanted to get other peoples opinions about it before I'm doing anything.	+	please don't feel offended. I'm just very (i know - overly) picky about consistency here. The server space reason is just one of the objections i have, actually the most objective one. I'm also worried about a consistent quality and "look
−
−	~~[[User:Wyrfel\|Wyrfel]] 00:08, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)~~
−	~~----~~
−
−	Sure, whatever you feel is best.<br>By the way, the reason I took the trouble with those pictures is that it took me a while to figure out the "Plus" designation part and whether that specific drive is or is not a "Plus" model (the abbreviated notation on the drive is confusing).
−
−	~~--[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 08:51, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)~~
−	~~----~~
−
−	~~== Region-enforcing firmware ==~~
−
−	~~<nowiki><rant></nowiki>~~
−	Damn, I don't believe I've paid this much for a broken-by-design DVD drive with firmware that enforces region coding in a way that blocks DeCSS. A flight-faring laptop owner would never want to watch movies on ''both'' sides of the Atlantic, right? These greedy, braindead bastards have evidently inhaled too many [http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/8714.jpg Windows keys].
−	~~<nowiki></rant></nowiki>~~
−
−	~~--[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 13:39, 10 April 2006 (CEST)~~
−	~~----~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 10 April 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:

	--[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 08:51, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)		--[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 08:51, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)
		+	----
		+
		+	== Region-enforcing firmware ==
		+
		+	<nowiki><rant></nowiki>
		+	Damn, I don't believe I've paid this much for a broken-by-design DVD drive with firmware that enforces region coding in a way that blocks DeCSS. A flight-faring laptop owner would never want to watch movies on ''both'' sides of the Atlantic, right? These greedy, braindead bastards have evidently inhaled too many [http://www.notebookreview.com/assets/8714.jpg Windows keys].
		+	<nowiki></rant></nowiki>
		+
		+	--[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 13:39, 10 April 2006 (CEST)
	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:51, 1 October 2005
Line 17:		Line 17:

	[[User:Wyrfel\|Wyrfel]] 00:08, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)		[[User:Wyrfel\|Wyrfel]] 00:08, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)
		+	----
		+
		+	Sure, whatever you feel is best.<br>By the way, the reason I took the trouble with those pictures is that it took me a while to figure out the "Plus" designation part and whether that specific drive is or is not a "Plus" model (the abbreviated notation on the drive is confusing).
		+
		+	--[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 08:51, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)
	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 30 September 2005
Line 11:		Line 11:

	For the record, the two pictures are ~60K each. If each and every one of the [[Special:Statistics\|(currently) 479]] pages that are "probably legitimate content pages" had a similar load, the total disk space for images would be around 60MB. --[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 18:20, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST)		For the record, the two pictures are ~60K each. If each and every one of the [[Special:Statistics\|(currently) 479]] pages that are "probably legitimate content pages" had a similar load, the total disk space for images would be around 60MB. --[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 18:20, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST)
		+	----
		+	Hei Thinker,
		+
		+	please don't feel offended. I'm just very (i know - overly) picky about consistency here. The server space reason is just one of the objections i have, actually the most objective one. I'm also worried about a consistent quality and "look&feel" of the pictures and pages (i.e., they should be included as thumbnails on the pages with a large scale version when one clicks them). However, this can be achieved i.e. by a templated way of integrating them and i'd be happy to look into that myself. But I just wanted to get other peoples opinions about it before I'm doing anything.
		+
		+	[[User:Wyrfel\|Wyrfel]] 00:08, 1 Oct 2005 (CEST)
	----		----

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:50, 15 February 2009
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 30 September 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	[[User:84.191.159.226\|84.191.159.226]] 14:14, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST)		[[User:84.191.159.226\|84.191.159.226]] 14:14, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST)
		+	----
		+
		+	For the record, the two pictures are ~60K each. If each and every one of the [[Special:Statistics\|(currently) 479]] pages that are "probably legitimate content pages" had a similar load, the total disk space for images would be around 60MB. --[[User:Thinker\|Thinker]] 18:20, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST)
	----		----