Talk:Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 - Revision history

Keks: /* Script doesn't work for me... */

2009-02-15T14:11:04Z

‎Script doesn't work for me...

Keks: /* Script doesn't work for me... */ new section

2009-02-15T13:43:52Z

‎Script doesn't work for me...: new section

Slushie: Dual-head and AIGLX

2007-01-23T23:16:31Z

Dual-head and AIGLX

Mattiasw: Moving applications between screens

2007-01-23T12:31:17Z

Moving applications between screens

Meta at 22:01, 29 November 2005

2005-11-29T22:01:33Z

210.54.152.120 at 04:59, 3 October 2005

2005-10-03T04:59:15Z

New page

What is the openGL performance like on this card? Could I play UT2004 and run the OpenGL screensaver hacks at a reasonable speed. In comparison To say a Radeon 9000/9200 card?

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 I'm in Ubuntu Edgy, which makes the jump from GLcore to AIGLX for GLX support, Thinkpad z60t (Intel 915GM card). Dual head worked fine under Dapper (using GLCore),  but now crashes X server when switching to-from a VT, or when attempting to run any OpenGL software (glxgears, glxinfo, et al). The kicker is once X has crashed it won't start up again without reboot. This is frustrating. I am about to embark on a hefty module recompile session, but I am curious if anyone has had this or similiar experiences.
-== Script doesn't work for me... ==
+== DRI Script doesn't work for me... ==
 If fails throwing a compiler error. dri.log looks like this:

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 15 February 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I'm in Ubuntu Edgy, which makes the jump from GLcore to AIGLX for GLX support, Thinkpad z60t (Intel 915GM card). Dual head worked fine under Dapper (using GLCore), but now crashes X server when switching to-from a VT, or when attempting to run any OpenGL software (glxgears, glxinfo, et al). The kicker is once X has crashed it won't start up again without reboot. This is frustrating. I am about to embark on a hefty module recompile session, but I am curious if anyone has had this or similiar experiences.		I'm in Ubuntu Edgy, which makes the jump from GLcore to AIGLX for GLX support, Thinkpad z60t (Intel 915GM card). Dual head worked fine under Dapper (using GLCore), but now crashes X server when switching to-from a VT, or when attempting to run any OpenGL software (glxgears, glxinfo, et al). The kicker is once X has crashed it won't start up again without reboot. This is frustrating. I am about to embark on a hefty module recompile session, but I am curious if anyone has had this or similiar experiences.
		+
		+	== Script doesn't work for me... ==
		+
		+	If fails throwing a compiler error. dri.log looks like this:
		+	make DRM_MODULES=i915.o modules
		+	make[1]: Entering directory `/home/keks/dri/common-20060403-linux.i386/drm/linux-core'
		+	make -C /lib/modules/2.6.27-gentoo-r8+keks-0.1/source SUBDIRS=`pwd` DRMSRCDIR=`pwd` modules
		+	make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r8'
		+	CC [M] /home/keks/dri/common-20060403-linux.i386/drm/linux-core/drm_auth.o
		+	In file included from /home/keks/dri/common-20060403-linux.i386/drm/linux-core/drm_auth.c:36:
		+	/home/keks/dri/common-20060403-linux.i386/drm/linux-core/drmP.h:44:26: error: linux/config.h: No such file or directory
		+	make[3]: *** [/home/keks/dri/common-20060403-linux.i386/drm/linux-core/drm_auth.o] Error 1
		+	make[2]: *** [_module_/home/keks/dri/common-20060403-linux.i386/drm/linux-core] Error 2
		+	make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r8'
		+	make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
		+	make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/keks/dri/common-20060403-linux.i386/drm/linux-core'
		+	make: *** [i915.o] Error 2
		+
		+	So somehow the file drm/linux-core/linux/config.h is missing. I am using Gentoo with a 2.27-r8 kernel, just in case it helps.
		+
		+	Any help is appreciated, [[User:Keks\|Keks]] 13:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 23 January 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Option "Xinerama" "true"		Option "Xinerama" "true"
	EndSection		EndSection
		+
		+	== Dual-head and AIGLX ==
		+
		+	I'm in Ubuntu Edgy, which makes the jump from GLcore to AIGLX for GLX support, Thinkpad z60t (Intel 915GM card). Dual head worked fine under Dapper (using GLCore), but now crashes X server when switching to-from a VT, or when attempting to run any OpenGL software (glxgears, glxinfo, et al). The kicker is once X has crashed it won't start up again without reboot. This is frustrating. I am about to embark on a hefty module recompile session, but I am curious if anyone has had this or similiar experiences.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 23 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there. I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem.		It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there. I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem.
	Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --[[User:Meta\|Meta]] 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET)		Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --[[User:Meta\|Meta]] 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET)
		+
		+	== Moving applications between screens ==
		+
		+	Do you mean xinerama?
		+
		+	Section "ServerFlags"
		+	Option "Xinerama" "true"
		+	EndSection

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 29 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What is the openGL performance like on this card? Could I play UT2004 and run the OpenGL screensaver hacks at a reasonable speed. In comparison To say a Radeon 9000/9200 card?		What is the openGL performance like on this card? Could I play UT2004 and run the OpenGL screensaver hacks at a reasonable speed. In comparison To say a Radeon 9000/9200 card?
		+
		+	It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there. I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem.
		+	Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --[[User:Meta\|Meta]] 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET)