Talk:Displays - Revision history

Igorr at 17:08, 24 February 2006

2006-02-24T17:08:03Z

2006-02-15T17:44:34Z

‎manufacturer column

2006-02-15T17:44:17Z

2006-02-15T17:08:13Z

‎manufacturer column

2006-02-15T16:50:27Z

manufacturer column

2006-02-15T15:35:35Z

2006-02-13T08:36:57Z

2006-02-13T08:19:09Z

2006-02-12T23:01:08Z

2006-02-12T21:09:48Z

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 20:22, 8 February 2006 (CET)
 ----
 == manufacturer column ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 15 February 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:

	--[[User:Drst\|Drst]] 18:53, 15 February 2006 (CET+1)		--[[User:Drst\|Drst]] 18:53, 15 February 2006 (CET+1)
		+	----
	I splitted the page into sub pages and redesigned the tables to include the two columns as suggested.		I splitted the page into sub pages and redesigned the tables to include the two columns as suggested.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 20:22, 8 February 2006 (CET)
 ----
 == manufacturer column ==
@@ Line 65: / Line 22: @@
 --[[User:Drst|Drst]] 18:53, 15 February 2006 (CET+1)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 15 February 2006
Line 61:		Line 61:

	--[[User:Tonko\|Tonko]] 17:50, 15 February 2006 (CET)		--[[User:Tonko\|Tonko]] 17:50, 15 February 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	It's a nice idea, and I thought about it. This will greatly increase the number of table entries, as often there are different types of panels used with the same basic specs. Also, it will not be easy to find certain manufacturers, and model numbers - even harder. Nonetheless, if you do add manufacturer / model columns, I'll try to fill them in as much as I can.
		+
		+	--[[User:Drst\|Drst]] 18:53, 15 February 2006 (CET+1)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 15 February 2006
Line 55:		Line 55:
	[[User:Drst\|Drst]] 17:21, 15 February 2006 (CET+1)		[[User:Drst\|Drst]] 17:21, 15 February 2006 (CET+1)
	----		----
		+
		+	== manufacturer column ==
		+
		+	I think we should add a column to the table with the actual manufacturer name and model.
		+
		+	--[[User:Tonko\|Tonko]] 17:50, 15 February 2006 (CET)

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 P.S. Evidently, the new T60p UXGA LCD panels are manufactured by Boe-Hydis, whose 200nits UXGA panel is rated 500:1 contrast on their site, so I put T60p in a separate line.
-[[User:Drst|Drst]] 10:21, 12 February 2006 (CET+1)
+[[User:Drst|Drst]] 10:21, 13 February 2006 (CET+1)
 ----

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 From [http://www-3.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=TPAD-FRU Thinkpad Service Parts]you can find out the manufacturer of each LCD panel for each Thinkpad model. Finding the exact panel model based on IBM's part number may be tricky, but in case of the Flexview it was easy, because the manufacturers only have one 15" SXGA+ IPS (wide viewing angles) panel that matches the characteristics of the Flexview.
-[[User:Drst|Drst]] 10:03, 12 February 2006 (CET+1)
+P.S. Evidently, the new T60p UXGA LCD panels are manufactured by Boe-Hydis, whose 200nits UXGA panel is rated 500:1 contrast on their site, so I put T60p in a separate line.
 ----

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 13 February 2006
Line 40:		Line 40:

	[[User:Wyrfel\|Wyrfel]] 00:01, 13 February 2006 (CET)		[[User:Wyrfel\|Wyrfel]] 00:01, 13 February 2006 (CET)
		+	----
		+
		+	From [http://www-3.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=TPAD-FRU Thinkpad Service Parts]you can find out the manufacturer of each LCD panel for each Thinkpad model. Finding the exact panel model based on IBM's part number may be tricky, but in case of the Flexview it was easy, because the manufacturers only have one 15" SXGA+ IPS (wide viewing angles) panel that matches the characteristics of the Flexview.
		+
		+	[[User:Drst\|Drst]] 10:03, 12 February 2006 (CET+1)
	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 12 February 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:

	[[User:Drst\|Drst]] 22:55, 12 February 2006 (CET+1)		[[User:Drst\|Drst]] 22:55, 12 February 2006 (CET+1)
		+	----
		+
		+	Hei,
		+
		+	how do you know who manufactures the panels and what model it is? Is this a broader source where we can get info for all the models from or do you just know it fro the R52?
		+
		+	[[User:Wyrfel\|Wyrfel]] 00:01, 13 February 2006 (CET)
	----		----

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ----
-I added a "Flexview" note to the SXGA+ and UXGA Flexview models and put the R52 SXGA+ 15" SXGA+ display on a separate line, because it is _not_ a Flexview.
+I added a "Flexview" note to the SXGA+ and UXGA Flexview models and put the R52 15" SXGA+ display on a separate line, because it is _not_ a Flexview.
 [[User:Drst|Drst]] 23:38, 11 February 2006 (CET+1)
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ----
-I'm sure about the brightness - it's 200 nits for both the Flexview and the non-Flexview on the R52, according to the Tabook. As for the constrast values, the Tabook doesn't tell them, but I looked at the sites of IDTech and LG-Philips, who manufacture the Flexview panels, and indeed it seems that you are right and the contrast is 400:1. I'll change it now.
+I'm sure about the brightness - it's 200 nits for both the Flexview and the non-Flexview on the R52, according to the Tabook. As for the constrast values, the Tabook doesn't tell them, but I looked at the sites of IDTech and LG-Philips, who manufacture the Flexview panels, and indeed it seems that you are right and the contrast is 400:1. I changed it.
-[[User:Drst|Drst]] 22:42, 12 February 2006 (CET+1)
+P.S. I guess one could find more information about the different screens by retrieving the part numbers for the LCD panels from Lenovo's site, finding the manufacturers and looking at their technical docs, as I did with the Flexview panels. At the moment I don't have time to do it, though.
 ----