ThinkWiki - User contributions [en]

ATI Mobility Radeon X1400

2006-04-14T12:29:30Z

Felixapitzsch: /* Proprietary ATI driver */

__NOTOC__
{| width="100%"
|style="vertical-align:top" |
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;">
=== ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 ===
This is a ATI video adapter

=== Features ===
* Chipset: ATI M54
* PCI ID: 1002:1745
* PCI Express x16
* 128MB GDDR1 video memory
</div>
|style="vertical-align:top" |
|}

=== Linux X.Org driver ===
Not Supported

==== ThinkPad LCD ====
Display on the internal LCD works as long as you set the monitor settings correct.

==== External VGA port ====
??

==== SVideo port ====
??

==== DVI port ====
??

=== Proprietary ATI driver ===
Proprietary [[fglrx]] driver version 8.24.8 adds support for the x1400 chipset (according to ATI changelog). However, correct functionality could not be verified yet.

=== Linux kernel Framebuffer driver ===
??

=== ThinkPads this chip may be found in ===
* {{T60}}

[[Category:Components]]

ATI Mobility Radeon X1400

2006-04-08T23:01:58Z

Felixapitzsch: /* Proprietary ATI driver */

__NOTOC__
{| width="100%"
|style="vertical-align:top" |
<div style="margin: 0; margin-right:10px; border: 1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#F8F8FF; align:right;">
=== ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 ===
This is a ATI video adapter

=== Features ===
* Chipset: ATI M54
* PCI ID: 1002:1745
* PCI Express x16
* 128MB GDDR1 video memory
</div>
|style="vertical-align:top" |
|}

=== Linux X.Org driver ===
Not Supported

==== ThinkPad LCD ====
Display on the internal LCD works as long as you set the monitor settings correct.

==== External VGA port ====
??

==== SVideo port ====
??

==== DVI port ====
??

=== Proprietary ATI driver ===
Proprietary [[fglrx]] driver seems not to support the X1x00 chip family (avivo).
{{cmdroot|modprobe fglrx}} with driver version 8.23.7 or older reports "no such device".

=== Linux kernel Framebuffer driver ===
??

=== ThinkPads this chip may be found in ===
* {{T60}}

[[Category:Components]]

Talk:Embedded Security Subsystem

2006-01-18T13:23:22Z

Felixapitzsch: /* X60, X60s and T60 with TCG 1.2-compliant Atmel chip */

Q: Good or Bad?

Someone said: This Security Chip is a hardware trojan. True or false?

== hmmm. depends. but the fear is big, that it is trojan... ==

Hello,

I would say it depends, how TCPA/'Fritz'-Chip is used. But the fear of the critics and (cyber) civil rights people are, that the industry wants to control the use of digital media like MP3, DVD, etc. to prevent copying - even if you own it.

There is also a fear, that there are hidden channels in this black box type of hardware, because hidden channels where found in so many black box type of hardware for years now. What is transmitted over these hidden channels?

The recent modifications by the TCG because of the critic and the resulting pressure are a good beginning. We, the consumers and users, have to go an with our demands, with our critic and we have to look carefully, what TCG and the others are doing here.

Why? Because it will affect all of us sooner or later in using our MP3- or DVD-Players or e.g. -Software on our computers etc. And you can think also about your mobile cellular phones, digital cameras and so on. Digital content, digital media is more and more widespread.

And this is where Digital Rights Management (DRM) comes into the game. DRM is feared to be a trade barrier for a free market, a barrier to future historians, etc.

Trusted Computing is not bad by meaning, but it is bad (or 'lousy'?), how the industry is implementing it. They could do better, right?

--[[User:Pitsche|Pitsche]] 12:19, 4 Jul 2005 (CEST)

== ESS page may have errors... ==

Hi, The ESS 1.0 section claims that its based on TCG 1.1 specs, but I cannot find anything to support that. The ESS 2.0 systems I have all have v1.1 TPMs in them, but I don't have an ESS 1.0 system. As far as I know, the ESS 1.0 does not implement any TCG specification.

Also, the ESS 2.0 does not provide a TCG 1.2 TPM. No currently shipping IBM platforms contain 1.2 TPMs. I thought I'd mention this stuff somewhere before just changing the wiki with no discussion.

Thanks
----
Thanks. You could have just changed it and leave a note with pointers to your sources. I also wondered about the fact that IBM says nothing about TCG in ESS 1.0, but i didn't find any more detailed information. Did you? And if so, where?

[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 19:59, 12 Jul 2005 (CEST)
----
Yeah, I am seeing less and less on ESS 1.0 on www.ibm.com, which is my source for this stuff. If I come across anything concrete, I'll post it.

== X60, X60s and T60 with TCG 1.2-compliant Atmel chip ==

Lenovo's "Personal Systems Reference" on Thinkpad Notebooks version 301, January 2006 states that Thinkpads X60, X60 and T60 are equipped with a "Trusted Platform Module / Atmel chip / TCG 1.2-compliant".

Could this be the Atmel AT97SC3203?
Can anyone confirm this?

What about linux support for this chip?

Update: In the same document I found "LPC bus (PC87382 Super I/O, AtmelÂ® 97SC3203)" in the architecture section.

Talk:Embedded Security Subsystem

2006-01-18T12:46:37Z

Felixapitzsch: X60, X60s and T60 with TCG 1.2-compliant Atmel chip