https://www.thinkwiki.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=BdzThinkWiki - User contributions [en]2026-05-05T02:03:39ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.31.12https://www.thinkwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bdz&diff=14541User:Bdz2006-01-10T22:39:57Z<p>Bdz: </p>
<hr />
<div>MSI S260 laptop<br />
<br />
0S: Gentoo Linux</div>Bdzhttps://www.thinkwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bdz&diff=14517User:Bdz2006-01-10T22:39:43Z<p>Bdz: </p>
<hr />
<div>MSI S260 laptop<br />
0S: Gentoo Linux</div>Bdzhttps://www.thinkwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pentium_M_undervolting_and_underclocking&diff=17202Talk:Pentium M undervolting and underclocking2006-01-10T22:26:55Z<p>Bdz: </p>
<hr />
<div>Hei Thinker,<br />
<br />
according to my notion of the character of this page, i thought it should possibly be renamed to something like "How to lower voltage and clock speed on Pentium M processors" ("lower" might be replaced by "finetune" or "manually lower" or "tweak" or something else expressing more the expert audience of the article). This has the following advantages:<br />
*complies with the naming scheme ;-)<br />
*has words more likely to be found in google (voltage vs. undervolting; clock, speed vs. underclocking)<br />
*Are undervolting/underclocking proper english words anyway?<br />
*Follows a scheme of "from general to specific". The topic of the article is underclocking/undervolting. That it's for Pentium M processors is kind of secondary to that.<br />
<br />
What do you think? I can do it if you agree.<br />
<br />
[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 00:21, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
Good points. Personally I'm fond of short technical titles, but I agree about accessibility and consistency with the rest of the site. I have a feeling (though no proof) that the under<i>clocking</i> doesn't really work (as I noted recently), so how about "Reducing voltage on the Pentium M processor" for now?<br />
<br />
BTW, "underclocking" is pretty standard techie jargon (and a clear parallel of the well-known "overclocking"). "Undervolting" is somewhat less common, though I've seen it in use. <br />
<br />
--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 00:55, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
== Which patch to use? ==<br />
<br />
Since I might find the time to fiddle around with reducing the power consumption further, I wonder which of the 3 alternatives works best. Any recommendations?<br />
<br />
--[[User:Spiney|spiney]] 11:05, 21 Dec 2005 (CET)<br />
----<br />
<br />
They all work... I think Alternative 2 is easiest to use.<br />
<br />
--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 13:06, 21 Dec 2005 (CET)<br />
----<br />
<br />
== Init Script ==<br />
Hi. I'm the author of the SysFS patch of "Alternative 2"<br />
<br />
I have recently seen that someone has added your init script to my wiki page on gentoo-wiki. But unfortunatly this guy has removed all the exisiting content of the page at the same time. So a few hours later an admin of the site as reverted the page to its previous state.<br />
<br />
Well that was just for the story of how I came to your wiki page. I just wanted to say That I have adedd again the init script to my page.<br />
It's a nice thing. A lot more "gentoo spirit" that what I was using before (that is adding some code in /etc/conf.d/local.start)<br />
<br />
I have made some modifications to the init script before adding it on my wiki page. So maybe you want to have a look at it.<br />
<br />
Cheers!<br />
--[[User:Bdz|Bdz]] 23:26, 10 Jan 2006 (CET)<br />
<br />
----</div>Bdz