Difference between revisions of "User talk:Bugmenot2"
(→Stop removing information!: new section) |
m (removed a pointless question) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | == Stop removing information! == |
| − | + | Stop removing information from ThinkWiki! "Dead links" are not "warts to be removed". Location is useful information. Especially [[Template:IBMDOCURL]]. [http://www.thinkwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Intel_440BX&diff=prev&oldid=58953 This resource is not even dead!] I will not undo your harmful butchering. (I would like to. I will not because it is tedious and too much.) You asked for feedback, so here is: I dislike much of your contributions. --[[User:Numeric|Numeric]] ([[User talk:Numeric|talk]]) 03:00, 14 November 2018 | |
| − | The | + | My apologies, then. The IBMDOCURL part wasn't very well explained, so I assumed that it was a lost cause. I will try to get that tidbit of 'dead links' back to where they should be, although I need some time to regain that information back. |
| − | + | Honestly, I felt that there has been worse b'utchering' going on, but I'll try to remove some of mine to fix that. | |
| − | + | :[[User:SunCatalyst]] did a lot of butchering two years ago. I would like to see eye-to-eye, understand why some seem to think "information which does not match an arbitrary template should be removed". I wish more wiki users had etiquette like [[User:Twt]]: [[Talk:BIOS_Upgrade_Downloads|ey asked before wiping all the old]]. I appreciate that you care and responded to my criticism, rather than ignore it and steam ahead. --[[User:Numeric|Numeric]] ([[User talk:Numeric|talk]]) 18:03, 20 November 2018 (CET) | |
Revision as of 21:47, 23 July 2019
Stop removing information!
Stop removing information from ThinkWiki! "Dead links" are not "warts to be removed". Location is useful information. Especially Template:IBMDOCURL. This resource is not even dead! I will not undo your harmful butchering. (I would like to. I will not because it is tedious and too much.) You asked for feedback, so here is: I dislike much of your contributions. --Numeric (talk) 03:00, 14 November 2018
My apologies, then. The IBMDOCURL part wasn't very well explained, so I assumed that it was a lost cause. I will try to get that tidbit of 'dead links' back to where they should be, although I need some time to regain that information back.
Honestly, I felt that there has been worse b'utchering' going on, but I'll try to remove some of mine to fix that.
- User:SunCatalyst did a lot of butchering two years ago. I would like to see eye-to-eye, understand why some seem to think "information which does not match an arbitrary template should be removed". I wish more wiki users had etiquette like User:Twt: ey asked before wiping all the old. I appreciate that you care and responded to my criticism, rather than ignore it and steam ahead. --Numeric (talk) 18:03, 20 November 2018 (CET)
