Difference between revisions of "Template:Note"

From ThinkWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Copied from Wikipedia)
 
(Oops, wrong file. Re-copied from Wikipedia.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<span class="reference plainlinksneverexpand" {{#ifeq:{{{noid}}}|noid||id="ref_{{{1}}}"}}><sup>{{#if:{{{2|}}}|[[#endnote_{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]]|[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}#endnote_{{{1|}}}]}}</sup></span><noinclude>
+
<cite id="endnote_{{{1}}}" style="font-style: normal;">[[#ref_{{{1}}}|'''^{{{2|}}}''']]</cite>&nbsp;<noinclude>
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}/doc}}
+
----
<!-- Add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage, not here! -->
+
Using ref/note tags is not the only way to do [[Wikipedia:Footnotes|footnotes]]. Some people prefer to use [[m:Cite/Cite.php|Cite.php]]. Cite.php has many advantages, but the use of it is not mandatory. You can use the [[User:Cyde/Ref converter|Ref converter]] to replace ref/note tags with the newer [[m:Cite/Cite.php|Cite.php]] style. Be aware that some articles use both the Note and Ref systems to provide separate Notes and References sections. If you are interested in the discussion, please see the [[Wikipedia_talk:Footnotes|Footnotes talk page]].
 +
[[Category:Citation templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
[[Category:Inline templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
[[sl:Predloga:Opomba]]
 +
[[sv:Mall:not]]
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:08, 17 August 2007

[[#ref_{{{1}}}|^]] 


Using ref/note tags is not the only way to do footnotes. Some people prefer to use Cite.php. Cite.php has many advantages, but the use of it is not mandatory. You can use the Ref converter to replace ref/note tags with the newer Cite.php style. Be aware that some articles use both the Note and Ref systems to provide separate Notes and References sections. If you are interested in the discussion, please see the Footnotes talk page. sl:Predloga:Opomba sv:Mall:not