Difference between revisions of "How to copy a Linux installation"
(→Advantages) |
(→Disadvantages) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=== Disadvantages === | === Disadvantages === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Because dd copies sector by sector it copies everything, including sectors that aren't allocated. This makes it a longer process. To update the backup copy, it must perform the whole process again, rather than simply updating the things that have changed. | ||
=== Case 1: The Linux installation is on a separate Harddisk === | === Case 1: The Linux installation is on a separate Harddisk === | ||
Revision as of 07:47, 2 December 2005
Contents
Using dd to make a 1:1 copy
Advantages
When dd is used to create the copy, it is copied at a sector by sector level. This means that in many circumstances, the new version will have it's boot sector set up and everthing. In situations where you are making a complete copy of the disk, even things like the IBM tools will be saved.
Disadvantages
Because dd copies sector by sector it copies everything, including sectors that aren't allocated. This makes it a longer process. To update the backup copy, it must perform the whole process again, rather than simply updating the things that have changed.
Case 1: The Linux installation is on a separate Harddisk
dd if=/dev/hd[a,b,c,..] of=/dev/hd[a,b,c,..] bs=2M
Part of Sourcedrive : if=/dev/hd[a,b,c,..] the Letter "a" for the first Harddrive, b for the second, ....
Part of Destinationdrive : of=/dev/hd[a,b,c,..] the Letter "a" for the first Harddrive, b for the second, ....
Case 2: The Linux installation is on a Partition
(e.g. hda1 is the Partition with the Linux installation and hdb1 is the Destinationdrive)
dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/dev/hdb1 bs=2M
