Difference between revisions of "User talk:Pitsche"
m (Thank you, Wyrfel, very good suggestion!) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Regards, | Regards, | ||
Wyrfel. | Wyrfel. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Thank you, Wyrfel, very good suggestion! == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hello Wyrfel, | ||
+ | |||
+ | thank you very much for you comment, this ia a very good suggestion! | ||
+ | |||
+ | I will start to write something to that. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Pitsche|Pitsche]] 11:26, 4 Jul 2005 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 10:26, 4 July 2005
hello! please add your comments here: --Pitsche 19:21, 3 Jul 2005 (CEST)
Hello,
just had a glimpse at your article. One thing...your introduction to this article in Embedded Security Subsystem mentions the chip built into current and past ThinkPads. But you do not state anywhere which of the TCG specs are already implemented in this chip. As far as i know remote sealing is not yet possible with it, is it? However, i think there should be a section telling people what ESS 1.0 and ESS 2.0 can do and can't do.
Regards, Wyrfel.
Thank you, Wyrfel, very good suggestion!
Hello Wyrfel,
thank you very much for you comment, this ia a very good suggestion!
I will start to write something to that.
--Pitsche 11:26, 4 Jul 2005 (CEST)